Digg.com, the popular user-provided news site, has sacked Google as its ad provider, and instead struck a three-year deal with Microsofts younger 'adCenter'.
The deal came as a surprise to the users of Digg, as the site has be known to support Apple and Unix, and practically campaign against Microsoft and its Windows systems. One Digg user, Lemonblood, stated simply, "Today is the day Digg died."
It has been suggested that Microsoft may have offered a revenue share that was too good to turn down, despite the fact that they may not make anything at all on them.
The deal has been likened to the one that Microsoft did with social networking site facebook last August. People are expecting to start seeing these deals take place with other such sites, for example, the fastly growing yet unfinished Sceneparty.com
I guess we'll have to wait and see
Thursday, 26 July 2007
Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Free Directories - huge list
Found a big list of free directories that I thought you might be interested in:
DirectoryCritic.com
Hope you find it useful!
DirectoryCritic.com
Hope you find it useful!
Thursday, 19 July 2007
Bookmarking Sites List
Hey, I've always wondered about all of the different bookmarking sites that there are nowadays, as well as the ones that everyone knows about. So when I came across a big list of them (on http://www.populair.eu/) I thought I'd share it with you
Alternatively of course, there is a pretty good little thing you can use:

This is a simple way of having lots of different bookmarking sites on your own, as it uses 34 bookmarking sites in one button. You can find these buttons absolutely free at AddThis.com
Anyway, this is the list:
1
del.icio.us/popular?new
2
furl popular headlines
3
stumbleupon buzz
4
simpy / de.lirio.us
5
netscape
6
rawsugar popular
7
hot spurls
8
clipfire popular
9
jots
10
backflip
11
wists top galleries
12
blogmarks most populair
13
ma.gnolia popular
14
wat vinden wij
15
netvous popular links
16
linkroll
17
feedmelinks mile-long
18
i89
19
linkaGoGo most popular
20
yahoo by popularity
21
blogmemes most popular
22
diigo
23
wink
24
livemarks (del.iciou.us)
25
populicio.us (del.iciou.us)
26
my bookmark manager
27
igooi most popular
28
connectedy hot topics
29
maple
30
openbm
31
blabb today pop
32
chipmark most recent
33
kmfavorites
34
Smarking popular
35
guicookies popular
36
Syncone
37
buddymarks latest
38
myhq
39
my link vault
40
myvmarks recent
41
sa.bros.us
42
scuttle
43
stylehive
44
recent dealclips
45
blinklist HOT now list
46
shadows
Alternatively of course, there is a pretty good little thing you can use:
This is a simple way of having lots of different bookmarking sites on your own, as it uses 34 bookmarking sites in one button. You can find these buttons absolutely free at AddThis.com
Anyway, this is the list:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Monday, 9 July 2007
SEO-Friendly Image Headers
OK, so everyone knows that images containing text that are used for headers are not very good for SEO. You can use the "alt" attribute, but its still not as good. So heres how to do it the SEO way...
HTML:
<h1><span>Your Header</span></h1>
Obviously, the difference here is that there is an extra "span" tag in there. Reason will become obvious in the styling...
CSS:
h1 {
background-image:url(yourimage.jpg);
width:200px;
height:40px; (Width and height must be that of the image)
}
h1 span {
display:block;
height:0;
overflow:hidden
}
This means that the text will essentially be there, but it will not be displayed
"Why not just use "display:none"?" I hear you say. (If you didn't, just humour me)
Well, its a possibility. That method is known as the Fahrner Image Replacement (FIR) technique. Unfortunately, it has a flaw, which is that it not only removes the visibility of the element, but it will also be ignored by screen-readers. Therefore if you want your site to be accessible by people with certain disabilities, it is better to use the first option.
Hope that helps you out!
HTML:
<h1><span>Your Header</span></h1>
Obviously, the difference here is that there is an extra "span" tag in there. Reason will become obvious in the styling...
CSS:
h1 {
background-image:url(yourimage.jpg);
width:200px;
height:40px; (Width and height must be that of the image)
}
h1 span {
display:block;
height:0;
overflow:hidden
}
This means that the text will essentially be there, but it will not be displayed
"Why not just use "display:none"?" I hear you say. (If you didn't, just humour me)
Well, its a possibility. That method is known as the Fahrner Image Replacement (FIR) technique. Unfortunately, it has a flaw, which is that it not only removes the visibility of the element, but it will also be ignored by screen-readers. Therefore if you want your site to be accessible by people with certain disabilities, it is better to use the first option.
Hope that helps you out!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)